January 11, 2015
- Power in Flux: The History of Electric Motorcycles (Kickstarter Project and book)
- InsideEVs contributing author: Motorcycles and other EV-related subjects
- Electric Motorcycle Primer “InsideEVs Style”: 5-Part Series on EV tech
- The Electric Chronicles: A builder’s reference site for Electric Motorcycles
- The Atelier Print: Redefining Fine Art Reproduction
- Photography: “des flous de ted dillard”
- ColorV2: Second Generation Color Management
- Power in Flux: Electric motorcycle builds
- The X-Y Easel: A tool to redefine digital Fine Art Reproduction
Drag Racing Belt Sander: World Record Attempt
- Digital Photography References: Links page
- Digital Photography Help Videos: Youtube page (Raw Pipeline, ColorV2)
- Ted Dillard personal videos: Youtube page (TedDillard)
CV, Resume: Case Studies, Sample Pieces and Portfolio
And now, may we present, the rest of the blog! Thanks for your interest.
June 28, 2015
Ted is both a knowledgeable and thought provoking writer at InsideEVs and has been a great addition to our team. His experience and depth of learning when it comes to both e-bikes (as well as other forms of e-transportation) is unparalleled.
October 17, 2014, Jay managed Ted at InsideEVs
Director: Mt Washington Auto Road ALT Energy Summit
Mt Washington Auto Road
General Manager of the oldest manmade tourist attraction in North America
Ted is an enthusiastic, knowledgeable and talented individual who we brought on late in the event planning stages who produced a very successful event for us.
September 18, 2013, Howie was Ted’s client
Owner, ELLIS VENER PHOTOGRAPHY and Photography Specialist
Ted Dillard’s “Color Pipeline” is an excellent introduction (or re-introduction) to digital color management for photographers.
While the same ground has been covered in other books by other authors Dillard’s breakthrough is to examine the language used to discuss the subject and to bring color management down out of the high falutin’ jargon-o-sphere into more comprehensible language. Having taught and written extensively about CM, I can testify that thisis no mean feat and his accomplishment is to make it far easier to grasp what color management is , what it does, and how to make it work for you.
December 22, 2008, Ellis was with another company when working with Ted at Lark Books
Technical Director of Photography at Northeastern University
I have worked with Ted at Northeastern University for a number of years now. I first knew him as the Digital Guru at EP Levine in Boston. Ted has always been one of the main “Go-to” guys in Boston. He is always right there on the cutting edge of what’s new in hardware and software, and he always has an answer (usually the right one) for any question or problem that comes up, as they always do. His honesty and humor make him a pleasure to work with, and his “never satisfied”
attitude keeps him focused on finding the best way to capture the best image, make a fine print, or manage a workflow. His book, “Raw Pipeline”, is a terrific teaching tool and resource.
August 28, 2008, Bruce worked directly with Ted at Lark Books
Ted is the one person you want to have around to get the right information. As a photographer, tech, and educator he is constantly learning and teaching. His energy and enthusiasm shows in everything he does.
His new book, RAW Pipline, should be on the bookshelf of every working photographer. It explains a clear but detailed explanation of not just what a RAW file is but how to manage the ever expanding process of photography and what is going on inside that fancy new D-SLR.
I would encourage anyone looking for a well rounded photographer to consider Ted. He will be able to meet your needs for any project, no matter how abstract or detailed.
August 20, 2008, Fred worked directly with Ted at Lark Books
Photographer, Creative Specialist, Principal: Chris Sanchez Photography
In the fall of 2008 I had the opportunity to work with Ted as he was an instructor at The Art Institute of Boston. At the time Ted was finishing his book, “The Raw Pipeline”, at the same time Ted was teaching the work-flow from the book to our class. A great instructor, with a deep understanding in photography; both technically and creatively. Teds teachings and writings are insightful, dynamic and enjoyably personable.
August 20, 2008, Chris was with another company when working with Ted at Lark Books
Photographer at ASA Photographic
I bought my first digital camera through Ted back in 1999. He became my mentor over the years and I have taken several classes that he has taught. I consider him my “Ace in the Hole” when it comes to the most up to date and accurate information around digital imaging and printing. Because of Ted, I have always been able to stay more educated then my competitors about the technology I use everyday for my business and that gives me that edge. Having that type of resource for any business is invaluable. With all the arguing and disputes about what gear to buy and what software is best, Ted was always there testing, not talking about it. That was always what made me know that I could take his input to the bank every time. Through all of this he still manages to keep his feet on the ground, maintaining the emphasis on the art of photography itself and not all the technological noise that comes with it. When it comes to digital imaging and printing, doing it right is to seek his approval.
August 20, 2008, George was Ted’s client
Adjunct Faculty- Digital Photography
Ted was an effective coach and mentor for our graduate level classes in Digital Photography at Northeastern. He gave each student a high level of individual attention exploring their creative potential, while at the same time providing an advanced level of instruction in techniques for image acquisition, refinement, and printing/display. I continue to use and build on what I learned in my two classes with Ted.
December 1, 2008, Leslie was Ted’s client
Technical Support and Marketing Specialist
Ted is one of the professors who pushed my work to the next level. Forcing advancement and leading by example. I have recommended his book to many of my own students and I take lessons from it daily. Words to not express my respect for his work.
August 24, 2008, Elisabeth was Ted’s client
TSP Imaging Services, Founder and Director
Tech Superpowers, Inc
Possibly the most important thing to realize about Ted is that he knows what he’s talking about. His experience in the photo industry is impressively deep, to be sure – but make sure to pay close attention when it comes to marketing, technology, imaging, sales, or just about anything else. It’ll be worth your while.
June 2, 2009, Ben worked with Ted at Tech Superpowers, Inc
Fractional Chief Marketing Officer | Marketing Consultant | Business Consultant | eCommerce | Retail | Digital
When I reached out to my friend, Michael Oh, at Techsuperpowers, I was unaware of Ted Dillard.
What I needed was the insight of a professional photographer, fused with the knowledge of the digital and technological advances, to create a cost-effective, efficient, multi-user, multi-city, photography and asset management workflow. Ted far surpassed any expectations I had. He engineered a strategy that allowed photographers and color houses in seven different cities to align to standards and protocol that created speed-to-market and cost advantages worth large dollars to our organization.
If you are in need of relevant, business-focused, world-class insight and experience to revamp the way your company does photography, Ted will be the last guy you call.
In an industry where everyone knows “something” about digital photography, Ted is the only expert in the country that I’ve experienced who knows “everything” about digital photography. Hire him, or accept less. It’s your choice.
August 23, 2008, Jay was Ted’s client
E. P. Levine
Vice President of Sales, Americas at Hasselblad Bron, Inc.
Ted’s title of Imaging Specialist doesn’t tell the whole story. He is a very smart guy who is an excellent educator, knows his stuff, and is very personable. I was sad to see Ted leave Calumet, but then had the pleasure to work with him again at Levines! He’s one of those guys that I always felt comfortable referring people to.
April 19, 2009, Gina was a consultant or contractor to Ted at E. P. Levine
Owner, Jared Leeds Photography
Ted was instrumental in my transition from film to digital. I was overwhelmed initially, but he presented things in a way that allowed me to make my transition relatively seamless. His knowledge is thorough and up to date and I feel confident about my abilities when I come to him for advice.
August 7, 2008, Jared was Ted’s client
Ted Dillard Photography
at Annie’s Gluten Free Bakery, LLC
I loved working with Ted, but even more important my clients loved working with him. Great, creative ideas, and made the most mundane products look beautiful.
September 14, 2008, Annie was Ted’s client
VP, Creative Director at BG
Ted helped produce some of the best work produced at the agency that I worked at. From Bose audio to retail shoe and steel manufacturers, he always delivered great results and vision that complimented the creative strategy for the project. He was easy to work with, great with solutions and personable, which made a great overall team effort. The final photography spoke for itself and stood out. I’d recommend him highly.
August 7, 2008, Mark was Ted’s client
June 27, 2015
We made it! With 4 days to go, Power in Flux: The History of Electric Motorcycles got 100% funding at $10,000, and is still going strong.
Why do I love this? Well, for a number of reasons, beyond the obvious. First, it shows me that it’s not my personal grail or indulgence, and that there’s interest and demand for this kind of work in the EV community. While I’m talking about community, it’s been really amazing how many people have spoken up and reached out to help – with resources, information, some gossip, and lots of details. I also can see where the support comes from, and that there’s interest outside of just the electric motorcycle community, the EV world, even the world of gasoline motorsports. The goal has been to write a book that reaches beyond the niche of the niche that electric motorcycles is, and it seems like there’s interest out there.
A HUGE thanks to the backers and everyone who’s helped. …and if you still want in, there’s still time. Order your book here.
Now the work begins!
For the last 8 years or so, I’ve been keeping track of resources and news about electric motorcycles over on my The Electric Chronicles blog. It wasn’t until recently that I realized that what I had was a pretty complete history of not only recent electric motorcycle development, but not-so-recent history as well… such is the nature of obsession. I also realized that it was a fascinating story of how science, technology, research and the market come together to make a revolution happen.
So I started a book.
What I find most interesting is about how the timeline of electric motorcycle illustrates bigger subjects of technology and innovation. We always hear about “Think Different”, but one of the key patterns in innovation is watching how individual pieces have to fit together to make that “Different” happen. What we know as the modern bicycle, for example, went through almost 50 years of fits and starts, through several interpretations of a two-wheeled, human-powered device… but until three unrelated bits came together – a manufacturing process that could make tube steel, inflatable, pneumatic rubber tires, and, most interesting, industrial roller chain – could the modern concept of a bicycle exist. The parallels in electric motorcycle development make this a fascinating story of 21st century innovation.
This is a book that will interest not only EV enthusiasts and motorcycle fans, but anyone interested in how breakthrough ideas incubate, fail, and succeed.
And, I started a Kickstarter campaign to fund the book. Take a look: Power in Flux: The History of Electric Motorcycles. If you’re interested, I hope you’ll consider backing the project. In the first 24 hours the project hit 25% of the funding goals, and 50% in a few days.
What’s most exciting, and personally satisfying, is how the electric motorcycle community has embraced and supported the project. Where I once had doubts that this was anything but a personal obsession, the community has stepped up and unequivocally weighed in: this is an important project, and people want to support it, both with their dollars, but also with information, resources and contacts.
Here’s the latest version of the outline:
• Battery development • Brand development • Community/forums • Racing
The Pre-history – makes and models, tests and development:
• The Age of Lead • 1900 to 1950 • the late 20th century • The Dawn of Lithium • The 2000s
Battery and Supporting Tech Development:
• A Short History of Lithium Battery Research • The BMS • The Motor and Controller Equation
The People (notable cast and characters of the 2002-present period):
• Mike Corbin • Michael Czysz • Terry Hershner • Chip Yates • Craig Bramscher • Livia Cevolini • Jeff Disinger • Shawn Lawless • Luke Workman • Azhar Hussain • Cedric Lynch • Neal Saiki • Brian Richardson • Bill Dube and Eva Håkansson
The Student Teams: Ohio State • Purdue • Virginia Tech • Kingston University (others)
Europe and the UK
The Australians: A continent in flux:
• Danny Ripperton • The Voltron • Racing
Endless Sphere (and the e-bike crossover) • Elmoto • ElectricMotorcycleForum • V is for Voltage • DIY Electric Car • Brammo Owners Forum
• The Early Years (Team Bettimoto and the EVN CUP) • The Isle of Man • TTXGP • FIM • eMotoRacing • MotoE • eFXC • Land Speed Racing • Drag Racing
• Zero • Brammo • Energica • Harley Davidson • Electric Motorsport • Agility Saietta • Quantya • KTM • Mission Motors • BRD • Vectrix • Electric Moto • ELMOTO • MotoCzysz • Oset • Roehr • Bell • Lito • Sarolea • Lightning • Amorak (others)
World’s Firsts, Records and Feats:
Mike Corbin • The NEDRA • KillaCycle • Shawn Lawless • Lightning • Chip Yates • Mission • Nathan Abbott • Terry Hershner • Team MotoElectra • Pikes Peak • Charlie MacArthur (more)
The Medicine Show: Emerging technology and the rise of the “PT Barnum Effect”
The Future of Electric Motorcycle – Overtaking a century of carbon-fuel development: Mainstream Manufacturers • Emerging Brands • Custom Builders
March 14, 2015
Somehow, over the years of hammering away at programs like Photoshop, I’ve had sort of a mental block trying to learn even the most rudimentary CAD software. Not too long ago Sketchup was a free program offered by Google, and I gave it a try… and failed miserably. Lately though, I decided it was something I really needed at the very least a basic understanding of. So I tried again.
I fetched around the internet and found the official Sketchup training videos – here’s the first basic intro, here:
The next thing I decided after messing around with dumb objects that had no real purpose was that I should work on an actual part. The dolly shown above was one that I’ve been wanting to draw, so, after chunking around with some not-so-actual parts, I decided to take a shot at an real design I’d been thinking about. This is the universal-fit wheel assembly for the X-Y Easel. That was the first step that made a real difference it learning this stuff. Do something real.
As it turns out, it’s not such a steep learning curve after all. It’s just, well, different.
Here’s the cool thing about a 3D modeling program. You get to look all around it. Here’s the bottom view:
Once I got around the toolbar a bit I realized it’s a lot like building a real thing. You need parts. You can get parts from the online source, or you can make them yourself. Here’s the basic wheel mount, with the brake assembly:
This is made up of a few “Components”, which are distinct parts that you can move in and out, much like a real assembly. Unlike when you draw additional things on a model, components stay intact. The blue frame shows you the outline of the component, in this case the wheel brake idea I had:
After making some pretty rudimentary parts, with no curved edges or anything, I decided to try to figure out how to make curved edges and refine the shapes a bit. The tutorials were OK, but when I just started Googling what I was trying to do I found some pretty helpful amateur tutorials. Unlike the official videos, these are much more specific to one subject.
Here’s the wheel I made, using the actual dimensions from a Rollerblade wheel:
And here’s how it fits into the assembly as a component:
So using that, I now have real-life dimensions I know will work. I can also see conflicts and problems before I start cutting stock – for instance, this slot for the brake spring mount is a problem if I don’t pay attention:
…and yes, of course you can move the light around and get a good look at things, just like real life.
Conclusions? Well, first, it’s not such a big deal. My biggest hurdle is to accept the fact that the tools aren’t the same as Photoshop. I found it frustrating that my instincts and habits were so, well, just wrong, and I had to get over it.
Second, I’m coming to the realization that the program probably isn’t all that great. It feels like one of those packages that tries to be simple, but in doing so is kludgy and does stuff you don’t expect or want. It’s useful, but I suspect messing around with a more professional program like Solidworks or Autocad is ultimately going to be more satisfying – though a much steeper learning curve.
Probably the biggest hurdle is learning “the rules” – or, in other words, figuring out the behavior of the program. What you can do, what it won’t let you do, especially since you’re moving things around in three dimensions. I still haven’t figured out how to draw certain things on certain planes without having to rotate them after. Really, that’s just a matter of practice and, as usual, digital hygiene. Nothing new here, folks.
But, at the end of the day, is this a 3D model that I can use? Most definitely yes.
February 11, 2014
A while ago I posted a photo from a series I did a long time ago – started in the early ’80s and finished up by ’87, documenting many of the buildings in the Town of Harvard that we felt were soon to disappear. Here is the complete set:
October 28, 2013
I want to make this as simple as possible, and it’s a subject that invites you to dive in to all manner of techno-vortices of Color Science. It’s really a simple question, though. Does it matter which light source I use to illuminate artwork for reproduction?
I’ve argued that the color and quality of the light source is crucial in reproducing the vision of the artist. I think I’ve demonstrated pretty well how the light quality affects the texture and surface of the canvas, but I’ve been struggling with a good way to demonstrate how the light color affects the perception of the various tones and values in a painting. I’ve been tempted to go into a deep, technical discussion of it, but then realized it’s really a very simple thing. Show how the colors are different with three basic light sources – tungsten, strobe and “full spectrum” fluorescent. The simplest way to show that is with a Colorchecker.
Basically, think of it in terms of throwing something at an object, and getting what bounces back. You can’t get back what you didn’t toss in the first place. If you’re not throwing red, for example (in the case of a fluorescent, specifically), you’re not going to get red bouncing back to the camera.
First, the video:
Now, the details.
The “Tungsten” version was shot using halogen gallery-type floods, the camera set to 3700K, and shooting RAW with the Nikon D800.
The “Strobe” version was simply changed to 5000K, and the “Fluorescent” version was 5000K as well. The fluorescent bulbs are so-called “continuous spectrum” 5000K bulbs, which is really a misnomer, a fact you can see by simply looking at a spectral response graph of any good bulb of this type, including those used on the Cruse Scanner and other similar devices.
The files were processed using Adobe Camera RAW, and a click-gray balance was made on the lighter of the two center gray patches. The shadows and highlights were adjusted slightly so the shadow and highlight points on the histograms would match up well. The files were cropped to the target, and processed with the default Adobe camera profile. The Working Color Space is Adobe1998.
Remember. The primary objective of the entire science and technology of CCD development and Color Management is to replicate the human visual experience of color. Color management tools’ job is to take these colors we see above and try to correct them to match the known colorimetric values of the target. They can do that a lot better and bring the colors closer to what we perceive if they have a starting point closer to where they’re trying to end up. If they don’t have the colors, they have to make them up, or stretch the colors they do have into the space they need to be.
The conclusions are pretty obvious to the eye, but even more so when you look at the histograms. Each light source is indeed different. The intensity of each of the color patches on the Colorchecker is rendered in a slightly different way in some cases, in others, the differences are pronounced.
So, yes, each is different. That begs a few questions.
Which one is more “accurate”? That question will send you down another vortex of Color Theory.
Which one is more faithful to what the artist saw? That question is simple. The light source that the artist used when creating the work can only be the most faithful to the artist’s vision and intent.